Going Down? - The Descent of Men


The Descent of Men describes the changing roles and expectations for men and women in our society. Dan Kindlon attributes this to the blurring of gender lines. Women are attending college at a higher rate than men, making up a more significant percent of the job market, and are showing, on average, more drive for advancement. Men on the other hand are becoming more content with women being on level ground with them and are taking on bigger parts of child rearing. In the 21st century, society's notions of gender are more complex than ever before. As the lines between masculine and feminine continue to blur, we can expect to live in a more progressive nation where men and women are not afraid, but even encouraged, to cross the gender line.


       Kindlon’s arguments solely utilize Logos. He rarely makes a claim that he cannot back up with data or studies. Because we have established that he is a credible writer, his use of statistical data is very effective. Statistical arguments cannot be refuted (unless you are arguing about the credibility of the data), but the author’s interpretation of the data can be. The paper would be stronger if more attention was placed on factors that are holding development and change back, such as misogynistic ideals and entrenched cultural sexism.


Gender-Bender

Today, I was tasked to imagine how my life might be different if I was born the opposite gender. Exercises such as this require a healthy sociological imagination, that is, the capacity to comprehend how sociological situations play out due to people's inherent differences and the differences in their social circumstances.

Anybody who thinks their life would not change significantly by being born the opposite sex is simply lacking the creativity necessary to take a step back and separate themselves from their social upbringing. This post will most likely end up sounding like a sociology assignment, because (guess what?) this is a sociological issue.

There are countless ways my life would be altered if I were born a woman, so I will be focusing specifically on personality and social life.

Our personality is first and foremost a product of our environment. If I was a woman, I would be different but not unrecognizably so. The morals and values I was instilled with would still be there, but the lens that I experience the world through would be different.

I would probably act more “girly” (i.e being more emotional and sensitive, more graceful and refined, and more centered around style).  Now obviously there is more to being a woman than exhibiting those specific traits, but those are ones that would overwhelmingly contribute to a noticeable difference to my personality.


As for my social life, I'm sure being a woman would do me wonders. I'm generally a fairly social guy, but there is a reason women are considered "social creatures.” Whether or not women, as a whole, are more social than men, the ways they choose to socialize make it appear so. Women are more inclined to form connections through conversations, whereas men are more inclined to bond through activities, be it football or Xbox Live. 

In my experience, women feel a stronger connection with each other then men do, and are more willing to go to one another for assistance. If I was a women, I would probably make more of an effort to be involved with different social groups and gatherings. As it stands, I am content with the ones I have.

"Easy is an adjective used to describe a woman who has the sexual morals of a man." ~Nancy Linn-Desmond

One thing I always hear from men is that if they were women, they would slut it up with no regard for consequences. And honestly, some actually might. But I think many people overlook that when you grow up as a specific sex, you are constantly absorbing ideas about gender roles and sexuality from the world around you. You come to accept and follow certain norms and preconceptions. You become scared of facing sanctions for actions that do not fit the exact mold society expects you to conform to. Both sexes are guilty of oversimplifying the others struggles and advantages. 

Honestly, I feel privileged to be a man. Would I feel privileged to be a woman? Absolutely. One thing that definitely wouldn't change about me is my belief that you should always be happy with what you were given. If you spend all your time bitching about how the opposite sex has it made, then you really don't deserve the privilege of being the sex you are, which is equally coveted.


Assimilation

In “Assimilation,” Mary Lynn, a middle-class Indian woman who is married to a white man, is overcome with the need to cheat on her husband because he is white. Half-jokingly, she refers to this desire as a “carnal form of affirmative action.” She senses its significance as both an antidote to her feelings of entrapment and an opportunity to unite with her Indian roots. Her desire ultimately brings her to a local coffee shop, where she quickly seduces a scarred Indian worker (with a generous helping of pudge) whom she takes to a cheap motel. Afterwards,  she feels denied the release that she so desperately craved, and instead feels underwhelmed and cynical with men in general. Later in the day when she and her husband are driving home, they encounter a suicide. He rushed off to investigate, and the temporary loneliness makes Mary realize that all the reasons she cheated on her husband are the things she loves most about him.




Sherman Alexie, the writer, immediately sets the tone of the story, creating a dramedy of sorts. However, obviously topics like infidelity and racial isolation are not inherently funny. Much in the form of "Death of a Salesman," we (the readers) experience a dramatic situation whose humor lies in the absurdity of how it is presented.

Mary Lynn is a very intelligent, yet very cynical woman who feels out of place in society and, more importantly, her own life. Much of the Pathos in this story is established by making Mary a character the reader can relate to. She is tired of the blandness that she associates with being married to a white man and falls prey to her own ethnic stereotype; the image of the strong, solitary, noble savage Native American man. When this too failed to give her life the spark of excitement she craved, she realizes how much she cherishes the value of being constant.

Alexie utilizes rhetoric very concisely, and rarely minces words. The refrain, "She decided to hate [all men]. Hate, hate, hate, she thought, and then she let her hate go."(p.486), is repeatedly used. This represents a mantra of sorts, and gives the reader precious insight into how Mary deals with adversity. My interpretation of this line is that the easiest way to respond to an emotion is to embrace it fully, and then let it pass over you. The line itself beckons to the rather famous "Litany against Fear," that was used throughout the Dune series.

"Assimilation," has helped give me a new perspective on the lives and struggles of Native Americans trying to find their place in America. This story illustrates how a sense of ethnic isolation can become a powerful enough force that it can make people commit acts they would have otherwise thought impossible.


A More Perfect Analysis

President Obama's 2008 campaign speech has been hailed as one of the most influential political speeches of the decade. Alternatively, some considered it a complete farce. However, both sides can agree on one this. This speech is about one thing, and one thing only: Race.

The speech itself addressed a number of issues which proved to be cornerstones in the 2008 election. These included rising racial tensions in America, socioeconomic inequality among races, and Obama's controversial connection with Reverend Jeremiah Wright, who previous to the speech, had made several inflammatory comments regarding race and American politics. 

When Obama states that, "…race is an issue that [this nation] cannot afford to ignore right now," he's not solely talking about his presidency, or gang violence, or the race-correlated education gap in America. Rather, he is referring to the big picture; A more united nation. A force that, once combined, has the power to tackle any and all obstacles in our path. However this is a future many cannot see because racial prejudices obscure their judgement. We can never afford to ignore racial tensions and simply sweep them under the rug, lest we, "widen the chasm of misunderstanding that exists between races."

Obama addresses both black and white discontent with their social and economic standings. Many black feel oppressed by a system they believe to be rigged against them. Alternatively, many working and middle-class whites feel that they haven't fared much better, as they watch their jobs and pensions disappear to individuals who don't even speak their language. To both sides, Obama reminds us that race has detracted from an exponentially more responsible culprit; a corrupt and insatiable corporate culture.

All of this serves to put Reverend Wright's comments into context. He is not just a crazy, racist, old man. Any comments Wright made reflect the underlying feelings and emotions that this nation (particularly the black community) has about race and inequality in America. And to cite those sentiments as racist or misguided is to ignore, and indeed perpetuate, the very reason why they exist in the first place.

tl;dr - Obama thinks it might help make the world a little less shitty if we all got along. Also, stop ripping on Reverend Wright. Dude's only human.

[Full Text & Video available at Huffington Post]



Introductions

Dear Interwebs,
This is my blog. I can't really speak for its content, seeing as it's class-mandated for a class I haven't been to yet, but I'm sure quality will flow forth. I am a Graphic Design major at Georgia State and plan on seeing how that pans out as a career. While I'm pretty plain-spoken, I usually speak my mind and am quite the cynic. I consider myself largely apolitical, because the issues that we need to face as a nation transcend political affiliation. I will update as my schedule permits. So yeah, blogs stuff yo!